Editorial
Measuring
Exposome Associated with Health
Survey on life course history, built and
ecological environment complements exposomics
Fengyu Zhang, Donald R Mattison
The
concept of exposome has received increasing discussion, including the recent
Special Issue of Science –"Chemistry for Tomorrow's Earth,” about the
feasibility of using high-resolution mass spectrometry to measure exposome in
the body, and tracking the chemicals in the environment and assess their
biological effect. We discuss the challenges of measuring and interpreting the
exposome and suggest the survey on the life course history, built and
ecological environment to characterize the sample of study, and in combination
with remote sensing. They should be part of exposomics and provide insights
into the study of exposome and health.
Copyright © 2020 by Global
Clinical and Translational Research
How to cite this
article:
Zhang F and
Mattison D. Measuring exposome associated with health: survey on life course history, built and
ecological environment complements exposomics. Glob Clin Transl Res.
2020; 2(2):46-50.
DOI:
10.36316/gcatr.02.0030.
References
1.
Wild CP. Complementing the
genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental
exposure meas-urement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev. 2005;14(8):1847-50.
2.
Brown E. Measuring individual exposome. Emerging
Science for Environmental Health Decisions Newsletter. 2012;2012(9):1-13.
3.
Rappaport SM, Smith MT. Environment and disease
risks. Science (New York, NY). 2010;330 (6003): 460-1.
4.
Wild CP, Scalbert A, Herceg Z. Measuring the
exposome: A powerful basis for evaluating environmental exposures and cancer
risk. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 2013;54(7):480-99.
5.
Wild CP. The exposome: from concept to utility.
International Journal of Epidemiology. 2012;41(1):24-32.
6.
DeBord D, Middendorf P, Hoover M. Exposome and exposomics.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2014. [Accessed 2020
February 20].
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/exposome/defaulthtml.
7.
Funk M, Ash C. A cleaner, greener future for
chemicals. Science. 2020;367(6476):378-9.
8.
Vermeulen R, Schymanski EL, Barabasi AL, Miller
GW. The exposome and health: Where chemistry meets biology. Science.
2020;367(6476):392-6.
9.
Barrett JR. Liver Cancer and Aflatoxin: New
information from the Kenyan outbreak. Environmental Health Perspectives.
2005;113(12):A837-A8.
10.
Escher BI, Stapleton HM, Schymanski EL. Tracking
complex mixtures of chemicals in our changing environment. Science.
2020;367(6476):388-92.
11.
Lan Q, Zhang L, Li G, Vermeulen R, Weinberg RS,
Dosemeci M, et al. Hematotoxicity in workers exposed to low levels of benzene.
Science. 2004;306(5702):1774-6.
12.
Elder G. Life Course Dynamics: Trajectories and
Transitions Cornell University Press; 1985.
13.
Zhang F, Hughes C. Beyond p-value: the rigor and
power of study. Glob Clin Transl Res. 2020;2(1):1-6. .
14.
Andra SS, Austin C, Wright RO, Arora M.
Reconstructing prenatal and early childhood exposure to multi-class organic
chemicals using teeth: Towards a retrospective temporal exposome. Environment
international. 2015;83:137-45.
15.
Barker DJ. The origins of the developmental
origins theory. Journal of internal medicine. 2007;261(5):412-7.
16.
Weinberger DR. Implications of normal brain
development for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Archives of general
psychiatry. 1987;44(7):660-9.
17.
Thomas WI, Znaniecki F. The Polish Peasant in
Europe and America. Boston: The Gorham Press; 1918.
18.
Mannheim K. The problem of generations. In:
Mannheim K, editor. Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: RKP;
1928;1952;1972.
19.
International Schizophrenia C, Purcell SM, Wray
NR, Stone JL, Visscher PM, O'Donovan MC, et al. Common polygenic variation
contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature.
2009;460(7256):748-52.
20.
Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders
AK, Nyholt DR, et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the
heritability for human height. Nature genetics. 2010; 42(7):565-9.
21.
Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A,
Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the
causation of cancer — analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and
Finland. New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;343(2):78-85.
22.
Czene K, Lichtenstein P, Hemminki K. Environmental
and heritable causes of cancer among 9.6 million individuals in the Swedish
Family‐Cancer Database. International journal of cancer.
2002;99(2):260-6.
23.
Jackson RJ. Environment Meets Health, Again.
Science. 2007; 315(5817):1337-.
24.
Renalds A, Smith TH, Hale PJ. A systematic review
of built environment and health. Fam Community Health. 2010;33 (1):68-78.
25.
Jackson RJ. The impact of the built environment on
health: an emerging field. American journal of public health.
2003;93(9):1382-4.
26.
Ward-Caviness CK, Pu S, Martin CL, Galea S, Uddin
M, Wildman DE, et al. Epigenetic predictors of all-cause mortality are
associated with objective measures of neighborhood disadvantage in an urban
population. Clin Epigenetics. 2020;12(1):44.