Structured Benefit-Risk Assessments: An Illustrative Case Study of Paracetamol Open Access

Rosa A. Piccirillo, MD and Jennifer Parish, MD MPH

October 17, 2022

DOI: 10.36316/gcatr.04.0046.

Abstract                                                                                                                    

This paper aims to provide an overview of the steps in developing a structured benefit-risk assessment, along with a simple, salient, and timely example of its implications. Using the time-tested, non-prescription drug paracetamol (a.k.a. acetaminophen) as an example, we demonstrate the fundamental role a well-structured benefit-risk assessment may play in clarifying the safety profile of even well-established medicinal products. The benefit-risk balance assessment performed by drug manufacturers and others involved in keeping drugs on the market is integral to a non-stop drug safety assessment continuum throughout a product’s lifecycle. This provides further reassurance that, as the world grapples with new diseases, pharmacovigilance systems with robust tools such as structured benefit-risk assessments can evolve and adapt by developing essential preventive and mitigative strategies. All these examples and practices contain the through-line of consideration for the protection of public health, a foundational cornerstone of pharmacovigilance practice. While a wealth of information may be explored on each aspect of the presented topics, the authors aim to give even those readers with only minimal background in pharmacovigilance an appreciation for the value of structured benefit-risk assessments. 

Keywords

Pharmacovigilance; Benefit-risk assessments; Paracetamol (acetaminophen); COVID-19

Copyright©2022 by the author(s). Licensee Global Clinical and Translational Research. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCBY4.0, https://creative-commons.org/license/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite this article. Piccirillo R and Parish J. Structured Benefit-Risk Assessments: An Illustrative Case Study of Paracetamol. Glob Clin Transl Res. 2022; 4(4): 8-15. DOI:10.36316/gcatr.04.0046.

References

1.         Warwick C. Paracetamol and fever management. J R Soc Promot Health. 2008;128(6):320–3. PubMed   DOI

2.         Saragiotto BT, Abdel Shaheed C, Maher CG. Paracetamol for pain in adults. BMJ. 2019; l6693. DOI

3.         World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines – 22nd List. 2021st ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.

4.         Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant for acute pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(12):CD009281. PubMed  DOI

5.       Straube A, Aicher B, Fiebich BL, Haag G. Combined analgesics in (headache) pain therapy: shotgun approach or precise multi-target therapeutics? BMC Neurol. 2011;11(1):43. PubMed  DOI

6.         Diener H, Pfaffenrath V, Pageler L, Peil H, Aicher B. The Fixed Combination of Acetylsalicylic acid, Paracetamol and Caffeine is more Effective than Single Substances and Dual Combination for the Treatment of Headache: A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Parallel Group Study. Cephalalgia. 2005 Oct 1;25(10):776–87. PubMed  DOI

7.         Abushanab D, Al-Badriyeh D. Efficacy and Safety of Ibuprofen Plus Paracetamol in a Fixed-Dose Combination for Acute Postoperative Pain in Adults: Meta-Analysis and a Trial Sequential Analysis. CNS Drugs. 2021;35(1): 105–20. PubMed  DOI

8.         Castro CT de, Pereira M, Santos DB dos. Association between paracetamol use during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: Prospective NISAMI cohort. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(4): e0267270. PubMed  DOI

9.         Fornasier G, Francescon S, Leone R, Baldo P. An historical overview over Pharmacovigilance. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018; 40(4):744–7. PubMed  DOI

10.      Prescott LF. Paracetamol: past, present, and future. Am J Ther. 2000;7(2):143–7. PubMed

11.      Federal Register: Establishment of a Monograph for OTC Internal Analgesic, Antipyretic and Antirheumatic Products [Internet]. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2006/12/26/E6-21855/internal-analgesic-antipyretic-and-antirheumatic-drug-products-for-over-the-counter-human-use.

12.      Sheen CL, Dillon JF, Bateman DN, Simpson KJ, MacDonald TM. Paracetamol pack size restriction: the impact on paracetamol poisoning and the over-the-counter supply of paracetamol, aspirin and ibuprofen. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2002;11(4):329–31. PubMed  DOI

13.      Internal Analgesic, Antipyretic, and Antirheumatic Drug Products for Over-The-Counter Human Use; Final Rule for Professional Labeling of Aspirin, Buffered Aspirin, and Aspirin in Combination with Antacid Drug Products [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2020 Mar 25]. PubMed

14.      Gunnell D, Hawton K, Bennewith O, Cooper J, Simkin S, Donovan J, et al. A multicentre programme of clinical and public health research in support of the National Suicide Prevention Strategy for England. Programme Grants Appl Res. 2013;1(1):1–216. PubMed  DOI

15.      Federal Register: Internal Analgesic, Antipyretic, and Antirheumatic Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Proposed Amendment of the Tentative Final Mono-graph; Required Warnings and Other Labeling [Internet]. [cited 2020 Mar 25]. PubMed.

16.      FDA Drug Safety Communication: Prescription Acetaminophen Products to be Limited to 325 mg Per Dosage Unit; Boxed Warning Will Highlight Potential for Severe Liver Failure. FDA [Internet]. 2011 Jan 13 [cited 2020 Mar 30]; Available from:

             http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-prescription-acetaminophen-products-be-limited-325-mg-dosage-unit

17.      Food and Drug Administration. Establishment of a mono-graph for OTC internal analgesic, antipyretic and anti-rheumatic products [Internet]. 2009 Apr [cited 2020 Mar 25]. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2009-04-29/pdf/E9-9684.pdf.

18.      Goldberger D, Vearrier D. Evaluation of a Food and Drug Administration Mandate to Limit Acetaminophen in Prescription Combination Products. J Med Toxicol. 2017;13(4):303–8. PubMed  DOI

19.      Mullins ME, Dunn SE. Comment on: Evaluation of a Food and Drug Administration Mandate to Limit Acetaminophen in Prescription Combination Products. J Med Toxicol. 2018;14(1):112–3. PubMed  DOI

20.      Drugs@FDA: FDA-Approved Drugs - Tylenol (acetaminophen) [Internet]. [cited 2020 Mar 29]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=019872.

21.      FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns of rare but serious skin reactions with the pain reliever/fever reducer acetaminophen. FDA [Internet]. 2019 Jun 21 [cited 2020 Mar 29]; Available from: http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-fda-warns-rare-serious-skin-reactions-pain-relieverfever-reducer

22.      Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee. PRAC recommendations on signals Adopted at the PRAC meeting of 3-6 February 2014 [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Mar 29]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/prac-recommendation/prac-recommendations-signals-adopted-prac-meeting-3-6-february-2014_en.pdf

23.      Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee. Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) Minutes of the meeting on 4-7 November 2013 [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/minutes/minutes-prac-meeting-4-7-november-2013_en.pdf.

24.      Straus S, Huber M. Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) Minutes of PRAC meeting on 06-09 April 2021 Minutes of PRAC meeting on 06-09 April 2021 (europa.eu).

25.      Brandlistuen RE, Ystrom E, Nulman I, Koren G, Nordeng H. Prenatal paracetamol exposure and child neurodevelopment: a sibling-controlled cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(6):1702–13. PubMed  DOI

26.      Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee. Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) Minutes of the meeting on 3-6 February 2014 [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/minutes/minutes-prac-meeting-3-6-february-2014_en.pdf.

27.      Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee. Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) Minutes of the meeting on 12-15 March 2019 [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/prac-recommendation/prac-recommendations-signals-adopted-12-15-march-2019-prac-meeting_en.pdf

28.      Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC). Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) Minutes of the PRAC meeting on 04-08 July 2016 [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/minutes/minutes-prac-meeting-04-08-july-2016_en.pdf

29.      The European Medicines Agency i. Start of referral communication: EMA to review modified-release paracetamol Measures to minimize risk and reduce harm of over-dose to be considered (EMA/457797/ 2016). 2016.  Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/referral/paracetamol-article-31-referral-review-started_en.pdf

30.     The European Medicines Agency. Paracetamol modified-release [Internet]. European Medicines Agency. 2018 [cited 2020 Mar 29]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/referrals/paracetamol-modified-release

31.      Bauer AZ, Swan SH, Kriebel D, Liew Z, Taylor HS, Bornehag CG, et al. Paracetamol use during pregnancy — a call for precautionary action. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2021; 17(12):757-766. PubMed  DOI

32.      Pergolizzi JV, Magnusson P, LeQuang JA, Breve F, Taylor R, Wollmuth C, et al. Can NSAIDs and Acetaminophen Effectively Replace Opioid Treatment Options for Acute Pain? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021;22(9):1119–26. PubMed  DOI

33.      Piccirillo R, Parish J. Pharmacovigilance Principles: The Building Blocks of Benefit-Risk Assessments. Glob Clin Transl Res. 2022;4(4):1–7. DOI

34.      U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Benefit-Risk Assessment in Drug Regulatory Decision-Making. 2018 Mar 30;14. https://www.fda.gov/files/about%20fda/published/Benefit-Risk-Assessment-in-Drug-Regulatory-Decision-Making.pdf

35.      Kisic V, Parish J. False-positive results of radionuclide imaging in lactating breasts: a pharmacovigilance perspective. Glob Clin Transl Res. 2020;2(2):38–45. DOI

36.      Large clinical trial to study repurposed drugs to treat COVID-19 symptoms [Internet]. National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/large-clinical-trial-study-repurposed-drugs-treat-covid-19-symptoms

37.      RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):693–704. PubMed  DOI

38.      European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Assessment report - Procedure under Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 - Dexamethasone in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/dexamethasone-covid19-article-53-procedure-assessment-report_en.pdf

39.      Zhanel GG, Zhanel MA, Boreskie KF, Lynch JP, Karlowsky JA. Risk versus Benefit of Using Hydroxychloroquine to Treat Patients with COVID-19. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol J Can Mal Infect Microbiol Medicale. 2021; 2021:5942366. PubMed  DOI

40.      Reis G, Silva EASM, Silva DCM, Thabane L, Milagres AC, Ferreira TS, et al. Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(18):1721–31. PubMed  DOI

41.      Kragholm K, Torp-Pedersen C and Fosbol E.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in COVID-19 - The Lancet Rheumatology 2021; 3(7): e465-466. PubMed   DOI